![]() |
| Export Control Related Troublesome Clauses in Contracts |
|
Award Acceptance
Grant Management Technology DevelopmentResearch Compliance Biosafety Conflict of Interest Debarment & Suspension Dual Use Research Export Control Definitions/FAQs Dual Use Research Lists to Check Troublesome Clauses Human Subject Research Research Misconduct Responsible Conduct Use of Animals |
Since
9/11 the Federal Government has began to impose and incorporate in
agreements severe restrictions on sponsored programs impacting
publications, participation of foreign nationals, data and information
sharing, etc. When restrictions such as these are imposed on
institutions of higher education, they limit our fundamental mission -
to educate and share information and discoveries obtained through
research. Often, restrictions placed on research and sponsored programs are not applicable when fundamental research is performed. However, just what "fundamental," basic," or "applied" research is, depends on the Federal Agency whose interpretation of these categories are just as diverse as numerous. Inconsistencies among federal agencies include the use of the term "Sensitive but Unclassified" which the Government will never define. One of the arguments is that although a particular work may be classified as Research and Development at the moment, the Government can not be sure of the path of the research - in case it does develop into a non-fundamental research, the Government is protected. Some Federal Agencies will insert clauses based on the pool of funding the award comes from. The pool of funding does not necessarily mean certain clauses do or do not apply. Budget categories, then, may include 6.1, 6.2 or 6.3 funding. They refer to:
Problematic clauses:
48 CFR 252-204-700 (DFAR) Disclosure of Information (1991)
Deviation/Negotiation solution: The
contractor shall be free to publish, permit to be published, or
distribute for public consumption, any information, oral or written,
concerning the results of conclusions made pursuant to performance of
this contract; provided, however, that it shall provide copies of any
such publication or release of information to the government's
contracting officer for review and comment at least thirty (30) days
prior to any such release. ARL 52.005-4401 Release of Information (July 2002) Army
regulations (AR) 530-1 and AR 360-1 prescribe Department of the Army
policies for operations security (OPSEC) review prior to public
release. These include:
These
policies are applicable to unclassified contracts/instruments as well
as the classified contracts/instruments governed in this respect by
DD Form 254. Army policy is to make available to the public the maximum accurate information on Army contract/instrument relationships, industry/academic accomplishments, and scientific achievements. In furtherance of this policy, each party agrees to confer and consult with each other prior to publication of any other disclosure of information relating to efforts under this contract/instrument. Prior to any public publication or disclosure, each party will offer the other party ample opportunity to review the proposed publication or disclosure, to submit objections, and to file application letters for patents in a timely manner. The contractor shall allow 60 days for completion of this process. Problem – Clause includes reference to “non-releasable, unclassified information” and a requirement to “confer and consult” prior to release of information. There is also institutional concern about what the breadth of the review is - referred to as a "kitchen sink issue." Substitution/Negotiation solution: Substitute with ARL Cooperative Agreement Language Prior Review of Public Releases. The
Parties agree to confer and consult with each other prior to
publication or other disclosure of the results of work under this
Agreement to ensure that no classified or proprietary information is
released. Prior to submitting a manuscript for publication or
before any other public disclosure, each Party will offer the other
Party ample opportunity (not to exceed 60 days) to review
such proposed publication or disclosure, to submit objections, and to
file application letters for patents in a timely manner.” ARL 52.004-4400 Foreign Nationals Performing under Contract (February 2002) In
accordance with Title 8 U.S.C. 1324a, local Foreign Disclosure Officers
(FDOs) may approve access by foreign nationals working on unclassified
public domain contracts for the duration of the contract, provided the
foreign nationals have appropriate work authorization documentation. In those instances where foreign nationals are required to perform under any resultant contract and employment eligibility was not submitted with an Awardee's proposal, the employment eligibility documentation specified at 8 CFR 274a.2 shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer at least two weeks prior to the foreign national's performance for review and approval. Awardees not employing foreign nationals in performance of any resultant contract may disregard this clause. Army Corps of Engineers (All installations) - 52.0000-4017 Foreign Nationals In
accordance sigh Engineering Regulation (ER) 380-1-18, Section 4, all
foreign nationals who work on any Corps of Engineers' contract or task
order shall be approved by HQUSACE Foreign Disclosure Officer or higher
before beginning work on a contract/task order. This regulation
includes subcontractor employees. The Contractor shall submit a letter
to the CERL Security Officer containing the following: Alternatively, the Army Corps of Engineers may include the following language, instead:
By
signing this award, the Contractor certifies that no foreign national
is working under this contract, regardless of pay status. Should
this change, the individual will require clearance prior to performing
any work under this contract. Foreign nationals must be approved
in writing via the issuance of a modification to this contract that
specifically identifies them by name and nationality. The
Contractor will notify the Contracting Officer in writing providing the
name and nationality and providing a copy of their VISA or other
information as required. National Security Agency Section K, -Representations, Certifications (d) Will non-U..S citizens be required to work on any resultant contract? Yes__ No__. If yes, please provide NOTICE:
This Agency may prohibit non-U.S. citizens from all or certain
aspects of the work to be performed under any resulting contract.
The fact that the Offeror intends the use of non-U.S. citizens on
any resulting contract will not necessarily disqualify the company from
consideration nor may the non-U.S. citizens finally be prohibited from
working on some or all aspects of any resultant contract.the following information on each individual: Last Name, First Name, Middle Name, Alias (if any), Place of birth, Date of Birth, Nationality, Employer and Address, Residence including street address, Other Identifying Information (i.e., passport number, visa number)
THE
SUCCESSFUL OFFEROR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER IN WRITING IF
ANY OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION CHANGES DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY
RESULTANT CONTRACT. Federal Aviation Administration - Civil Aviation Security Publications The
Associate Administrator for Civil Aviation Security, ACS-1, or
designee, must review all research related to civil aviation security
prior to release to the general public. This includes such items
as dissertations, theses, archival and conference technical papers,
technical reports, etc. This requirement is to determine if the
results contain information that may assist terrorists in undermining
established security systems. Information must be submitted by the grantee to the FAA Technical Monitor, whom then forwards the information to the Associate Administrator for Civilian Aviation Security, ACS-1 through his or her respective appropriate management official. Within 30 days of receipt by the FAA Technical Monitor, a notice of approval, declination, or a request for modification of the publication will be provided by the Office of Civil Aviation Security, ACS-1, to the FAA Technical Monitor. This notice will then be forwarded to the grantee by the FAA technical monitor. Subcontract Clause Examples: Industry Sub-Prime Contract with DoD This
effort is unclassified, and access to classified material is not
anticipated. Any proposed public release of information
associated with this effort should be submitted to The Prime 70 days
prior to the proposed release time, in order to allow Prime to comply
with its contract. Government Laboratory (Fermilab) Sub - DOE Prime (FL 90--4/02) In
connection with any activities in the performance of this subcontract,
the Subcontractor agrees to comply with any "Sensitive Foreign Nations
Controls" requirement that may be attached to this subcontract,
relating to those countries which may from time to time, be identified
to the Subcontractor by written notice as sensitive foreign nations.
The Subcontractor shall have the right to terminate its
performance under this subcontract upon at least 60 days prior written
notice to fermilab if the Subcontractor determines that it is unable,
without substantially interfering with its policies or without
adversely impacting its performance to continue performance of the work
under this subcontract as a result of such notification. if the
Subcontractor elects to terminate performance, the provisions of this
subcontract regarding termination for convenience of Fermilab shall
apply. The provisions of this clause shall be included in any
sub-subcontracts. SBIR Sub-DOD Prime Prior
approval to use non-U.S. citizens to perform on this Order, at either
the prime or sub-contract level must be obtained from the Contracting
Officer and the Director, Intelligence and Security Directorate.
To request approval for use of non-U.S. citizens (including
permanent resident aliens) in performance of this Order, a letter of
request should be provided to SBIR Company containing the name of the
individual, country of origin, summary of tasks to be performed and a
point of contact in case there are any questions. SBIR Company
will immediately forward said requests to the Government's Contracting
Officer for approval. Problems
This is a problematic clause to dispute. These clauses are mostly seen in contracts involving controlled technology and sponsored by military agencies. First, we will contact the PI and sponsor’s technical person on the project. There is a possibility that the PI is doing the basic research and the sponsor will take those results and work on the controlled technology at another location. However, if applicable, the university will suggest the following versions to replace/modify grantor's language:
AFMC 5352.227-9000 Export-Controlled Data Restrictions (July 1997) Export Controlled Data Restrictions in selected contract awards, requiring an export license prior to assigning any foreign national to work on the project or allowing foreign persons access to the work, equipment or technical data generated by the project.
Problem Publication Clauses: FAR 52.227-17 - Rights in Data - Special Works & FAR 52.227014 - Rights in Data - General Problems:
Alternate IV (December 2007) to FAR 52.227-14 As prescribed in 27.409(b)(5), substitute the following paragraph (c)(1) for paragraph (c)(1) of the basic clause: (c) Copyright—
|